From the Pastors Desk | ||
The Body | The Mind of Christ | Lesson # |
Activities Manchaca Bible Fellowship |
Oct-3-1999 | Bible Lessons Operation Outreach |
A couple of lessons ago, we saw that what we teach and believe, and the manner in which we teach what we believe, makes a great difference in our concept of what constitutes "godliness" or holiness. Far too many Believers have the distorted idea that living godly is a vehicle or means by which they can gain physical blessing or protection for themselves and their kin. That is a false concept, and when taught by word or life, it is false doctrine. If this is our belief structure, then we will never know true holiness or godliness in our conduct. Instead, we will be living in UNGODLINESS.
This is a fact we must recognize and understand if we are to EVER know holiness in our conduct. Many Believers are not really interested in living in true Biblical holiness, so that they will be godly like Christ. Many are content to simply have a structure that is only a "form of godliness". From this type of teaching, and from those who are teaching such, we are to "withdraw".
Why is the Holy Spirit so adamant against teaching ANYTHING but "the doctrine which is according to godliness"?? Why would the Holy Spirit speak so harshly against those who "suppose" that godliness is a means by which to acquire personal benefit? Why would the Holy Spirit be against people doing things that they believe are acceptable means of godliness? You would think that God would give these people a little recognition for at least trying. After all, they weren't doing as the "Wrestling Governor", and speaking out against religion. They were promoting religion. Both of these groups of<
In this first account of a "form of godliness" that was for "personal gain", we find that Cain was the first to bring an offering "to the Lord". Then the Bible says that Abel ALSO brought, indicating that he was following after Cain, at least in sequence if not as an example. These offerings were BOTH brought to the Lord. We have no reason to doubt the sincerity of either man. However, one was accepted by God, and the other was rejected by God. Not rejected by the Education Committee, BUT by God, personally. We see another trend that started clear back in the beginning. Those NOT following God's pattern often become angry with those who are, and will resist any help offered to bring them into God's pattern. It doesn't matter who offers the help, or how it is offered. A person in this condition will often resist EVEN when God, personally, pleads with them.
That was true in the beginning. It was true in Paul's day. It's true today, and it's true in this church. That is simply human nature! From this first appearance of a "form of godliness but denying the real power of God", came a society in which "every thought and imagination of the heart was only evil continually". Ultimately that "FORM OF GODLINESS" brought the judgment of God in the form of the flood. You see God has only one right way to godliness. Any OTHER way is Ungodliness. As we will see, there are many ways of expressing godliness, but only one way to godliness.
Unless we understand what godliness and holiness are, we will reach for the wrong thing, even though we may be very sincere in our wrong actions. We have seen, earlier in our study, that neither holiness nor godliness are achieved by means of physical actions. Godliness and holiness are internal of the heart and attitude. HOWEVER, we must also keep in mind that it is impossible to have the right heart attitude, IF the external action are acts of sinfulness and selfishness. It cannot be repeated too often that anything that is not godly is UNgodly. There is no middle ground. There is no "gray" area. The Word of God gives us example after example, and list after list of things and attitudes that are the result of holiness, and likewise those that are a result of ungodliness. As Believers, we are to eliminate those actions and attitudes that fall under the Biblical classification of ungodly. We are to develop those actions and attitudes that fall under the Biblical classification of Godlikeness. It is by these actions that we prepare or condition our "earthen vessel" as a channel "fit for the masters use" to demonstrate God's holiness through the Fruit of the Spirit. Mankind was made, by God, as a "demonstrator". Not as a demonstrator marching and carrying a placard. Mankind was to be a demonstrator of God's essence, personality and holiness. The first human was made in the "image of God".
ONLY mankind was made, by God, with the capacity to "demonstrate" God's likeness.
Here and elsewhere in the Word of God, we see that things created by God can and do declare his greatness and glory. However, ONLY humanity, of all God's creation, can "demonstrate" God's very person or essence. Only mankind was made in the likeness or image of God. All the rest of creation can and does give an accounting, or a tally that proves God's greatness. In and through creation, a person can learn a lot about God. These many created things can enumerate or count up the glory and value of God. BUT only mankind was created by God specifically to "demonstrate" or manifest the Person or image of God.
So much to see here that applies to our subject of letting God's essence or His glory shine through our conduct. These heathen of Rom 1 did not use the truth supplied by God about Himself as the basis for their belief and actions. They pushed aside, squelched and distorted the truth they did have. A lesson we need from this portion...: Even though we are not heathens(?), we must not push aside, squelch or distort the truth of the Word of God. Even though we are not heathens, IF we respond to God's truth in the same manner as these heathens, we will have a similar response in our life and/or the lives of those entrusted to us. In the case of the heathens of Therefore, they created "gods" from human experience and philosophy, and then fashioned those gods into the form of things seen or created. This form of (un)godliness placed "mankind" as the central focus of their religion, INSTEAD of Christ as the central focus. The truth on which they based their religion, was man's wisdom instead of God's wisdom found in the Word of God. I realize we would not do such things, BUT just in case we might slip sometime, we need to understand the process and the consequences. These two Biblical illustrations, of Cain and the heathens of
If we teach or listen to teaching other than "the doctrine
which is according to godliness".., we will develop a religion that has a form of
godliness, such as Cain's, but denies the power of true godliness. If we
suppress the truth of God, given by God, we will do as those in Either way, we are practicing UNgodliness, and we are as far from holiness as we can get. That may not have been our intention, BUT those will be the results. If we "exchange" the truth of God for anything other than the truth of God, we have "exchanged" it for a lie. It will be lie no matter how appealing to the human nature it might be, or how logical to the human mind.
In our study, we have seen that this "light of the knowledge of the glory of God", that we received at salvation and should to shine though our "earthen vessels" or conduct, is no less than the very essence of God, and in particular His holiness. To discover how we are to allow this "Light" to shine though us, we have been looking at the total context of Scripture, and now are looking at the immediate context of this passage. We see from our study of the total context that one of the very prominent features of God's Person or essence is that of appropriate forgiveness. In the immediate context of this passage on earthen vessels, we also find the subject of forgiveness. Paul, in If we are teaching and following anything but "the doctrine which is according to godliness", We will be and are...: proud, knowing nothing, obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, promoting envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wranglings, and are people of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, supposing that godliness is a means of gain. I thought about sending an Email to God to see if He would instruct His head angel to change this portion by using some "gentler" words. But I know the "circuits" are pretty busy going into heaven, so I might not get a response. Therefore, I didn't send the Email.
A person in this condition of self-centerness and self-promotion, CANNOT give appropriate forgiveness, nor can they accept it. That's ONE reason why it is so important what we teach, and how we teach it!!!!! Let's look a little further into this subject of Biblical forgiveness.
Notice several things very important to forgiveness in situations
where an offense occurs against a person or the church. First there was punishment
appropriate to the offense. We saw from If this type of punishment were practiced by the church today, it would rid the church of the growing immorality within its ranks. Instead, we are told, by some, that we are to: "Love them back to the Lord." A partial truth is a lie --- AND that is a partial truth.
Forgiveness for an offense cannot be effected
unless
payment is made or punishment received.
The payment can be made
or that punishment can be received
by the offender or someone else
acting in the offender's stead,
and by permission of the offender.
In the case of the sin of mankind in general, God could not forgive without the punishment being received and the payment made by God, Himself, through Christ on the Cross. In the case of an offense against another or a group of others, God has given mankind the right and obligation to assess the appropriate punishment. This punishment is not for the payment of sins in general (Christ took care of that on the cross), BUT for the offense against a person, a group or society. Very seldom is this punishment to be determined by an individual, AND never is it to be assessed or inflicted as revenge or vindictiveness. This is also true in the case of your children. The punishment should be assessed by the parents... BOTH parents... in harmony with one another and the Word of God. If appropriate punishment is not received and the penalty not paid by the offender, others will have to pay the penalty and receive the punishment. That is true of society, AWANA clubs, the church, the home, etc., etc., etc. As a nation, as the church and as families, etc., we have failed to prescribe the proper punishment for almost any offense. As a result, the family, the church and society IS paying the price and receiving the punishment for past and present offenses that have been over looked. There are very few who would not agree with that assessment, today. Oh, yes! There are a few ol' relics of rank liberalism that still have their heads under the covers of: "Man is basically good. If we take restraints away, then the goodness of mankind will be allow to mature." The question of today is not concerning the NEED of punishment for offenses. The question of today is WHO makes the determination of what the punishment is, and WHAT standard do we use. There would be no questions as to WHO makes the determination or WHAT standard we follow.., IF those same people who embrace the demonic philosophy of the goodness of mankind had not thrown out all the "old fashion" standards of morality from the Bible, and replaced them with: "If feels good, do it", and a few other nice sounding phrases. Personal forgiveness is as much for the one forgiving as for
the one being forgiven. Notice the close of this admonition for forgiveness in
As Believers, we are to be prepared to suffer for the wrong of others -- when it is to the advantage of the cause of Christ. When we suffer because we have conscience toward God, we are to take it patiently. Not only is this commendable in general, this commendation is brought right into the Throne Room of God, and presented to God, Himself. This type of suffering for the wrong of others is one of the things we, as Believers, are called to do. We are to participate in this calling in the same manner as Christ by following His example. It might change your home life considerably, if you practiced this principle at home . Just a sideline. Those who hold to the theological position that our "calling" was part of God's predestination of some to salvation and others to condemnation have a problem with the MANY references to our calling to suffering and other aspects throughout the Word of God. I guess they just have to ignore those references, or maybe they think we have to suffer before we can be saved???? I don't think so!!!! It is strange how we want to limit God's revelation of Himself to mankind by the philosophy of some humans. If we are trying to develop personal characteristics like those of Christ, then appropriate forgiveness must be one of those characteristics. If we are trying to follow Christ's example in our conduct so that our vessels will be a suitable channel through which Holy Spirit can demonstrate God's holiness, then according to this passage, we must be willing to accept the punishment for the wrong doings of others.., when it is for conscience towards God, or when the cause of Christ can be advanced by so doing.
In the process of appropriate forgiveness for offenses, the punishment should NEVER be for the sake of punishment ONLY!! It should be as a demonstration of your love for the other. When God met out the punishment for the sins of the world, it was a demonstration of His essence of LOVE. When Christ accepted the punishment for the sins of the world, it was also a demonstration of His LOVE.
Isn't it strange that we often think of LOVE as ONLY a soft, fluffy, mushy, sentimental thing?!?!? Punishment for offenses MUST always be as a result
of love, NOT revenge or vindictiveness. Also in the forgiveness process, punishment must
ALWAYS be for the purpose of restoration. We see that in
We have a couple of half truths floating around, and you know what a half truth is. Sad to say these half truths have also found acceptance within Christian circles. These half truths have filtered into Christian theology BECAUSE some very prominent teachers began teaching the experiences of others, and philosophies of mankind.., instead of teaching ONLY "the doctrine which is according to godliness". Those half truths are expressed in many ways, but the most popular goes something like: "Unconditional Love" and "Unconditional Forgiveness" I understand a little of what they are trying to get across by such statements and teachings, BUT I also know that there is not such critter. What most mean by unconditional love is that: "You should love me no matter what I do." That part is true. BUT the inference and the major import is that: "As a result, I can do anything I want to do without consequences." That would not be love at all!!!! To an even greater extent, the use of the term and the teaching of "unconditional forgiveness" has been stretched beyond recognition of any Biblical teaching. Forgiveness is based on the fact that the offense has been properly cared for, by the offender, or by someone else. I'm glad God does not love or forgive according to the philosophy of the world!!!! |
||
© Clyde White, Austin TX, 10-3-99 |